AIM DECODED

4-3-5. Unexpected Maneuvers in the Airport Traffic Pattern

AIM Text

There have been several incidents in the vicinity of controlled airports that were caused primarily by aircraft executing unexpected maneuvers. ATC service is based upon observed or known traffic and airport conditions. Controllers establish the sequence of arriving and departing aircraft by requiring them to adjust flight as necessary to achieve proper spacing. These adjustments can only be based on observed traffic, accurate pilot reports, and anticipated aircraft maneuvers. Pilots are expected to cooperate so as to preclude disrupting traffic flows or creating conflicting patterns. The pilot-in-command of an aircraft is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of the aircraft. On occasion it may be necessary for pilots to maneuver their aircraft to maintain spacing with the traffic they have been sequenced to follow. The controller can anticipate minor maneuvering such as shallow “S” turns. The controller cannot, however, anticipate a major maneuver such as a 360 degree turn. If a pilot makes a 360 degree turn after obtaining a landing sequence, the result is usually a gap in the landing interval and, more importantly, it causes a chain reaction which may result in a conflict with following traffic and an interruption of the sequence established by the tower or approach controller. Should a pilot decide to make maneuvering turns to maintain spacing behind a preceding aircraft, the pilot should always advise the controller if at all possible. Except when requested by the controller or in emergency situations, a 360 degree turn should never be executed in the traffic pattern or when receiving radar service without first advising the controller.

Source: FAA Aeronautical Information Manual · current edition · paragraph 4-3-5.

The short answer

This AIM section is FAA advisory guidance cautioning pilots against unexpected maneuvers in the airport traffic pattern. Because ATC sequencing relies on observed and anticipated traffic, it advises that a 360-degree turn should never be made in the pattern or while receiving radar service without first advising the controller, consistent with 14 CFR 91.3.

Research Notes

Common Questions

Can I make a 360-degree turn in the traffic pattern to gain spacing?

The AIM advises that except when requested by the controller or in emergency situations, a 360-degree turn should never be executed in the traffic pattern or when receiving radar service without first advising the controller. A 360 after obtaining a landing sequence usually causes a gap in the landing interval and a chain reaction that may conflict with following traffic.

What maneuvering can a controller anticipate from me in the pattern?

Per the AIM, a controller can anticipate minor maneuvering such as shallow “S” turns, but cannot anticipate a major maneuver such as a 360-degree turn. If you decide to make maneuvering turns to maintain spacing behind a preceding aircraft, you should always advise the controller if at all possible.

Who is ultimately responsible for spacing decisions in the pattern?

The AIM states the pilot-in-command is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of the aircraft. ATC establishes the sequence of arriving and departing aircraft based on observed traffic, accurate pilot reports, and anticipated maneuvers, and pilots are expected to cooperate so as not to disrupt traffic flows.