FAR DECODED — TITLE 14 CFR

Refusal to Submit to an Alcohol Test or to Furnish Test Results

Regulation Text

§ 61.16 Refusal to submit to an alcohol test or to furnish test results.

A refusal to submit to a test to indicate the percentage by weight of alcohol in the blood, when requested by a law enforcement officer in accordance with § 91.17(c) of this chapter, or a refusal to furnish or authorize the release of the test results requested by the Administrator in accordance with § 91.17(c) or (d) of this chapter, is grounds for:

(a) Denial of an application for any certificate, rating, or authorization issued under this part for a period of up to 1 year after the date of that refusal; or

(b) Suspension or revocation of any certificate, rating, or authorization issued under this part.

Research Notes

Implied Consent in Aviation

Section 61.16 creates an aviation analog to the implied-consent doctrine in motor vehicle law. Operating an aircraft in the United States implies consent to alcohol testing when requested by law enforcement under § 91.17(c). Refusing that test — or refusing to furnish test results to the Administrator — carries the same certificate consequences as actually failing the test: denial, suspension, or revocation.

The cross-reference to § 91.17(c)-(d) is critical: § 91.17(c) authorizes law enforcement to request a blood-alcohol test when there is reasonable cause to believe a pilot has operated an aircraft in violation of the alcohol prohibition. § 91.17(d) requires pilots to provide test results to the Administrator upon request.

NTSB precedent: Refusal to test has been treated as evidence of consciousness of guilt, supporting certificate actions even where no BAC level was established. The FAA's position is that there is no regulatory or legal benefit to refusing the test — the certificate consequences are identical to a confirmed violation, without the benefit of a BAC result that might fall below the threshold.

Note: This section does not address employer drug testing programs (Part 40) or random testing programs under Part 121/135. Those have separate regulatory frameworks.

CFI Commentary

Highlighted phrases in the regulation text above link to instructor notes at the bottom of this page. Look for the amber or blue highlights — each one flags a gotcha or a pro tip worth knowing.

Amendment History

2016-12-30

AOA Notes

These notes correspond to the highlighted phrases in the regulation text above. Each one flags something worth knowing — a common misread, a checkride gotcha, or a practical pro tip.

Gotcha: Refusing the Breathalyzer Gets You the Same Outcome as Blowing Over the Limit
There is no regulatory benefit to refusing an alcohol test in aviation. If law enforcement requests a blood-alcohol test under § 91.17(c), refusal is independently grounds for certificate suspension or revocation — the same consequence as actually being over the limit. Unlike some states' DUI laws where refusal creates a separate administrative offense, in aviation the consequences run parallel. The FAA treats refusal as consciousness of guilt. Take the test.
↑ back to text