Regulation Text
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate a civil aircraft within the United States with knowledge that narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances as defined in Federal or State statutes are carried in the aircraft.
(b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any carriage of narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances authorized by or under any Federal or State statute or by any Federal or State agency.
Research Notes
Section 91.19 prohibits the carriage of narcotic drugs, marijuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs/substances aboard a civil aircraft, except as provided by federal or state authority. It is a strict-liability rule — the FAA's enforcement does not depend on the pilot's knowledge, only on the aircraft having served as the conveyance.
The lawful carriage exception: Paragraph (a) excludes carriage authorized by federal or state statute or by a federal or state agency. This covers DEA-licensed shipments, medical patient transports with prescribed controlled substances, and pharmacy-to-pharmacy shipments under appropriate authority. It does not cover personal-use carriage of state-legal marijuana in the cabin.
State legalization is not a defense: Marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law (Controlled Substances Act, 21 USC § 812). State legalization does not provide a defense to § 91.19. The FAA Chief Counsel reaffirmed this in multiple interpretation letters — pilots flying state-legal cannabis between in-state locations have faced certificate enforcement action and emergency revocation under § 91.19.
Pilot certificate exposure: Conviction of a violation of any federal or state controlled substance statute is grounds for denial, revocation, or suspension of any FAA-issued certificate (§ 61.15). Section 91.19 enforcement frequently triggers parallel § 61.15 action. The combination — civil penalty, certificate revocation, and possible criminal charges — makes drug-carriage one of the most career-ending FAR violations.
Strict scope: The reg applies to the PIC, the owner, and any operator of the aircraft. Even if a passenger smuggled controlled substances unknown to the pilot, the FAA may still pursue the certificate holder under § 91.19. Pilots running Part 91 charter-like operations should brief passengers and have explicit consent-to-search policies in their operations manual.
Reference: FAA Chief Counsel letters on marijuana carriage (2017, 2020); FAA Order 2150.3C sanction guidance. See also DOT Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy.
Amendment History
Amendment History Coming Soon
Every time this regulation changes, we'll record it here — the date, what was amended, and a plain-English summary of what shifted.